vendredi 30 juillet 2010

"CONCENTRATED DOSE" IS REDEFINING FOOD & BEVERAGES

CONCENTRATED DOSE

New Nutrition Business July 2010


The “daily dose” or “concentrated dose”

format has become one of the defining

product formats of the global nutrition

business – in Asia at least, where it is long established.

But in the West it is still an

embryonic concept and one most marketeers

continue to shy away from.

The concept of a “concentrated dose”

– meaning a high, and effective, dose of

an active ingredient in as small a package

as possible (for example a beverage in a

1.7oz-6oz or 50ml-180ml package) – has been

growing in popularity in Europe over the last

decade, and the idea is now, at last, taking off

in America, after years of resistance to the

concept from marketers.


PROVEN TRACK RECORD IN LAUNDRY

PRODUCTS

It’s a format that achieves differentiation

and premium pricing, and reassures

consumers that they are getting a guaranteed

“concentrated dose” of the effective

ingredient that provides the benefit they are

looking for.

It’s a compelling idea and one with a

proven track record – “concentrated doses”

have long been established as one of the most

powerful concepts in consumer marketing.

In laundry powders and liquids for example,

products that offer a “concentrated dose”

have been redefining the market for a decade.

The reason for this development is a very simple one,

as a senior Unilever executive was quoted as saying:

“Consumers are looking for convenience

and ease of use. Convenience is the big trend

as consumers’ lives get more hectic.”

As a result of the willingness of companies

such as Unilever and Proctor & Gamble

to respond to consumers’ needs for ultraconvenient

products, in the $34 billion (€27

billion) global laundry powders and liquids

market “concentrated dose” powders and

liquids have grown to a 35% market share, a

retail sales value of $9.5 billion (€7.6 billion).


NEGLECTED OPPORTUNITY IN FOOD AND

DRINK

“Concentrated dose” is an opportunity that

has been neglected by all but a few food and

beverage companies. However, that is slowly

beginning to change.

On a conservative estimate, global sales

of concentrated dose beverages are, at retail

prices, already $8.5 billion (€6.9 billion), of

which probiotic dairy and energy shots are

the single largest segments.


This change is driven by three very

compelling factors:


1. Differentiation through

packaging: Good packaging, particularly

innovative packaging, is crucial to creating

successful health propositions in increasingly

over-crowded markets. At its best, packaging

supports the brand in asserting its difference

from the competition. It’s the best way to

catch the consumer’s eye and earn premium

prices and better-than-average profit margins.


Innovative packaging performs several

important functions:

• It signals to consumers that “this is

something very different”.

• It can be used to mask a price premium.

It is a good way of achieving high

margins since consumers have no

similar existing products to function

as a comparison. Using packaging,

companies can create new price points

and achieve much higher selling prices

for their products. In particular, selling

in single-serve packages makes it very

difficult for consumers to easily compare

prices, whereas putting your new product

in a standard 1-litre gable-top carton

makes it look like every other brand on

the shelf and enables consumers to easily

compare prices between your product

and regular products.


• When you use packaging innovation

to create a new category then you are

defining the direction in which many

of your competitors must go and you

are defining the packaging format they

must adopt. You are in effect establishing

your credentials as a market leader and

innovator.


2. I-Nutrition: We live in an era in

which there is an increasing desire for

customization to meet individual needs. It

applies across all categories of products,

and one of the best examples is the iPod

or the iTouch, which enable an individual

to carry around with them thousands of

their favourite pieces of music and listen to

them alone, through a set of headphones,

whenever and wherever they like. For our

ancestors music was a social and collective

pleasure, with people coming together with

friends, relatives or fellow villagers to enjoy

the same music together, as a group. Today,

thanks to technology, its enjoyment is more

often a solitary, individual activity.

So too with food. As a result of longer

working hours, greater social and geographic

mobility, greater social isolation (33% of

households in Amsterdam are single-person,

for example, and 25% in Australia) and the

breakdown of traditional family structures

and meal occasions, more and more people

eat alone.

At the same time, even where people live

in traditional families, their food choices are

dictated less and less by custom, tradition

and family and more and more by highly

personalised views about health and nutrition

and a desire for products that meet an

individuals’ own health needs – a result of

the huge attention given to diet and health

by the media, where you will find thousands

upon thousands of articles in magazines,

newspapers and on websites relating to

health. It sometimes seems that almost every

media source offers a “nutritionist” giving

advice.

As a result of the flood of what is often

conflicting advice, people have given up on

trusting experts and have decided to instead

form their own views about what works

for them as individuals, which means that

consumers are increasingly customising their

nutritional choices every day. The 45-year-old

mother drinking a dairy drink to boost her

bone health, for example, or her husband

consuming something to keep his cholesterol

level down, are both making individual

choices which might not be seen as relevant

by any other family members.

In short, we live in the era of I-Nutrition,

in which – when it comes to health – singleserve

packages have more appeal than family

packages.


3. Better sales, better margins,

better profits: If neither of the above

factors is persuasive enough, then the one

that should be is that the few companies

who have adopted the concentrated dose

packaging format have found that the format

delivers:

• Higher sales

• Increased profit margins

• New consumers who are loyal, with

repeat purchase rates of 80% and above,

and willing to pay premium prices even

during recession


WHAT THIS MEANS FOR INNOVATION

Customisation towards individual nutritional

preferences is not only a strategy worth

adopting by companies planning to develop

their presence in health, in many cases it is

the only strategic choice available.

Every company that’s looking to target

particular health benefits has to consider, as

part of their innovation process, whether,

and how, it can produce a product that could

deliver the maximum effective dose of a

health ingredient in a small and thus ultraconvenient package.

DANONE RACHETE 51% DE PROVIVA


Danone rachète 51% de Proviva

lefigaro.fr
29/07/2010 | Mise à jour : 13:47

Le groupe suédois de produits laitiers, Skaanemejerier, propriétaire de la marque de boissons aux fruits Proviva, a annoncé ce jeudi que Danone avait acquis la majorité du capital du fabricant de la boisson, Proviva AB.

Le groupe suédois explique dans un communiqué
que le groupe alimentaire français détiendrait 51% de Proviva AB à terme. Les termes financiers de l'accord, qui débutera fin 2010, n'ont pas été précisés.

jeudi 29 juillet 2010

SENIOR STAFF QUIT CADBURY AFTER KRAFT TAKEOVER

Senior staff quit Cadbury after Kraft takeover

More than 100 senior staff from Cadbury have left since the firm was taken over by Kraft in February, it has emerged.

The US firm said 120 out of 165 senior staff from Cadbury, whose jobs were under consultation at Bournville and Uxbridge, have now left.

However, a spokesman said that amount of movement was not unusual and was commonly part of the integration process when two companies merged.

Kraft was criticised by MPs in April for the way it handled the takeover.

'History and tradition'

John Bradley, who used to run the Cadbury World tourist attraction, said managers were leaving in large numbers because Kraft do not value the brand's heritage.

Start Quote

They seem not to understand what they have bought”

John Bradley

Mr Bradley, who worked for Cadbury for 24 years before leaving the company in 2004, said: "Kraft seem not to care one iota about the history and tradition of Cadbury.

"They think they have just bought a series of brand names that they are going to integrate in their business just like they did Ritz Crackers and Toblerones and the other things that they bought.

"So, to my mind, they seem to not understand what they have bought."

Kraft said that its UK offices would be consolidated into existing offices at Bournville and Uxbridge.

It also said that former executives at Cadbury had taken one third of Kraft's top 50 positions across the company.

The remaining 45 employees, out of the 165 under consultation, had been given permanent roles in the organisation, the firm added.

"While this is a period of uncertainty for both Cadbury and Kraft Foods colleagues, we pride ourselves on being as sensitive and respectful as possible," a spokesman said.

Irene Rosenfeld, chief executive of Kraft, is planning her first visit to the Bournville plant, in Birmingham, later this year

PSA PEUGEOT CITROEN RENOUE AVEC LES PROFITS

PSA Peugeot Citroën renoue avec les profits


lefigaro.fr
28/07/2010 | Mise à jour : 17:59
Crédit Photo AFP
Crédit Photo AFP Crédits photo : AFP

Le constructeur automobile enregistre une progression de 20% de son chiffre d'affaires à fin juin, le résultat courant se redresse tout comme le résultat net. Pourtant, les marchés sanctionnent des perspectives jugées trop faibles.

Les constructeurs automobiles ont semble-t-il mangé leur pain noir, au regard de la publication des résultats semestriels de PSA Peugeot Citroën. Le groupe Peugeot, dirigé par Philipe Varin, annonce un bon de 20,8% de ses ventes à 28,39 milliards d'euros. A périmètre et taux de changes constants, la progression ressort à 15,5%. Cette bonne évolution des ventes est à mettre sur le compte des succès des nouveaux modèles et à une demande mondiale bien orientée, notamment dans un pays comme la Chine.

Du côté des résultats, ils marquent une progression significative et surtout un retour dans le vert. Le résultat opérationnel s'inscrit ainsi à 1,137 milliard (perte de 826 millions un an plus tôt). La division «Automobile» qui l'an dernier avait été fortement impactée par la conjoncture économique se redresse nettement et redevient bénéficiaire à 525 millions (perte de 904 millions un an plus tôt).

Le chiffre d'affaires de la division «Automobile» s'inscrit en hausse de 13,5 % à 21, 1 milliards au premier semestre 2010. Celui généré par les ventes de véhicules neufs a progressé de 14,7 % à 15, 820 milliards, sous l'effet d'un nombre record de ventes. Quant au résultat net, il s'affiche également en territoire positif à 680 millions d'euros contre un déficit de 962 millions il y a un an. Par action, le résultat ressort à 3 euros (-4,24 euros à fin juin 2009).

Du mieux en Chine

Le groupe note une forte amélioration de la rentabilité de sa co-entreprise en Chine avec DongFeng. Les ventes de véhicules ont progressé de 50% à 176.000 unités et le résultat net part du groupe a atteint 97 millions d'euros.

De quoi donner du baume au coeur à Philippe Varin, le patron du constructeur. Cité dans le communiqué, il indique : «La création d'une deuxième joint-venture en Chine représente une étape majeure dans le développement de nos opérations hors Europe. Elle nous rend confiants dans notre capacité à réaliser la moitié de nos ventes de véhicules sur les marchés non-européens d'ici 2015, contre un tiers en début d'exercice 2010. »

Pour l'ensemble de l'année, PSA table sur une croissance à deux chiffres en Chine.

«Un environnement négatif»

Au deuxième semestre, les perspectives sont moins bonnes. «Clairement, le contexte économique va être moins favorable qu'au premier semestre», a prévenu Philippe Varin lors d'une conférence de presse organisée en marge de la présentation des résultats. «Ce contexte économique aura un impact négatif au deuxième semestre, dû à la situation des volumes de marchés qui vont être en décroissance significative sur l'Europe», a-t-il expliqué. Le patron du constructeur prévoit en plus «un impact négatif dans le domaine des matières premières», notamment l'acier dont les prix augmentent.

Le groupe devrait «poursuivre ses gains en matière de performance» pour tenter de «faire mieux que l'objectif» fixé pour cette année à 1,1 milliard d'euros d'économies, annonce le Philippe Varin.

En dépit de cet environnement difficile et de la saisonnalité habituelle, PSA estime que la division «Automobile» devrait être proche de l'équilibre au second semestre. Dans ce contexte, le groupe anticipe un résultat opérationnel courant de l'ordre de 1,5 milliard d'euros.

La Bourse sanctionne

A la Bourse de Paris, les investisseurs voient rouge. A la clôture, les titres PSA reculent 4,10% à 23,85 euros. Pour les analystes, la sanction traduit une déception sur les perspectives du groupe. «PSA annonce une marge opérationnelle de 1,5 milliard pour l'année après 1,137 au premier semestre. Cela signifie que la progression sera très faible au deuxième semestre, de l'ordre de 360 millions d'euros», note Pierre Bergeron, analyste automobile chez Société Générale. «Les résultats sont bons, mais ils étaient anticipés. Ce qui interesse les marchés, c'est le futur. Or la suite s'annonce moins bonne pour PSA sur un marché qui sera en baisse à l'echelle européenne».

Morgan Stanley a égaement contribué ce mercredi à plomber la confiance des investisseurs sur ce titre. Dans une note, la banque évoque des résultats «bons, mais pas suffisants» et appelle à la prudence pour le second semestre et même sur long terme avec des perspectives qui ne devraient pas s'améliorer avant 2011. «Les anglo-saxons font le marché. Si eux sont prudents, la Bourse de Paris suit», explique Pierre Bergeron

PROCTER & GAMBLE ET LE COI ANNONCENT UN PARTENARIAT OLYMPIQUE INTERNATIONAL

Procter & Gamble et le COI annoncent un partenariat olympique international

Procter & Gamble (NYSE : PG) et le Comité olympique international (COI) annoncent aujourd'hui un partenariat international des plus ambitieux pour les cinq prochaines éditions des Jeux olympiques, de Londres 2012 aux jeux de 2020.

L'envergure du portefeuille P&G, qui comprend 22 marques générant chacune 1 milliard de dollars américains ou plus de chiffre d'affaires annuel, et le vaste public international de quatre milliards de personnes touché par P&G, font de ce partenariat le projet olympique le plus ambitieux qui soit. Parmi certaines des marques P&G les plus connues participant au partenariat figurent Pampers®, Tide®, Ariel®, Always®, Whisper®, Crest®, Pantene® et Olay®.

P&G tirera parti de la réussite de son partenariat Team USA lors des Jeux olympiques d'hiver de Vancouver en 2010, qui ont engendré une amélioration de la perception des marques de la société, une augmentation des parts de marchés et près de 100 millions de dollars d'augmentation duchiffre d'affaires. La société exploitera le partenariat avec le COI pour réaliser sa stratégie de croissance à bon escient et contribuer à l'amélioration de la vie des athlètes, des mamans et de leurs familles au travers de la planète.

« P&G est fier de soutenir le mouvement olympique pour les 10 prochaines années », déclare le Global Marketing and Brand Building Officer de P&G, Marc Pritchard. « Mais nous savons grâce aux brillants résultats de Vancouver qu'il s'agit de bien plus qu'un simple sponsoring. Pour P&G, il s'agit de s'associer au COI pour améliorer la vie des athlètes, des mamans et de leurs familles, en faisant entrer le mouvement olympique dans les foyers des quatre milliards de consommateurs au service desquels nos marques se dévouent au travers de la planète ».


TFI News 28.07.10

RIBOUD 'DANONE MISE SUR LA SANTE ET LE PLAISIR

Riboud : «Danone mise sur la santé et le plaisir»

Le Figaro

Le 27 juillet 2010

Par Ivan Letessier


Franck Riboud, le PDG de Danone, compte sur sa R&D pour lancer de nouveaux aliments.

Activia pourrait se diversifier en dehors du yaourt, avec des produits à base de fruits.


LE FIGARO. - Quels sont les ressorts de

la bonne croissance de vos ventes au

premier semestre ?

Je salue ces bonnes performances. Il ne

faut pas oublier qu'elles interviennent dans

un contexte de crise. C'est la démonstration

parfaite que la stratégie mise en place est la

bonne. La focalisation sur les volumes

nous a permis de gagner des parts de

marché dans tous les métiers et dans tous

les pays. Nous recueillons les fruits de

l'internationalisation du groupe vers les

pays émergents. Dans un environnement

qui reste très tendu, nous sommes

optimistes pour Danone, sereins et

concentrés. Nous sommes sereins car nous

avons nos marques, nos métiers, des

équipes focalisées sur leur stratégie. Nous

sommes plutôt France 1998 en terme

d'équipe!


Vos marges, en revanche, ont reculé.

Votre modèle de croissance de crise estil

pérenne ?


Notre objectif reste de maintenir cette

année notre marge stable et de reconduire

notre niveau de 2009, 15,3%, notre record

et l'une des plus hautes marges du secteur.

Il n'y aura pas de baisse, mais nous ne

poussons pas non plus les feux au-delà car

les arbres ne montent pas jusqu'au ciel:

nous voulons construire sur des bases

solides et nous ne sommes pas là pour faire

du court-termisme. En 2010, nous

continuons à raisonner d'abord en parts de

marché, plus qu'en progression de marges.


Comment allez-vous réaliser

500 millions d'économies en 2010 ?


Les gains de productivité portent sur

différents facteurs: la façon d'acheter du

lait en poudre pour la Chine, l'amélioration

des recettes de certains produits, les efforts

de réduction des émissions de CO2 liées

aux emballages. À un rythme de 5 millions

de bouteilles d'Evian vendues chaque jour,

nous pouvons faire des économies de

plastique. Nous avons lancé des

programmes de gains de productivité tous

azimuts. Sur ces 500 millions d'économies,

il n'est pas prévu de restructuration sociale.


Quelles sont vos perspectives sur

l'évolution de la conjoncture et des

tendances de consommation en Europe

de l'Ouest ?


Nous faisons l'hypothèse que nous

resterons sous pression au cours des cinq

années qui viennent. L'évolution de la

consommation dépendra beaucoup de celle

de la grande distribution. En Espagne, il

n'y a plus que le leader, le n° 2 et les

marques de distributeurs. Cette tendance

va s'accélérer en raison de la rationalisation

des coûts et des gammes. Notre objectif, en

tant que leader, c'est d'avoir une relation

commerciale construite sur le long terme et

de contribuer à la croissance de nos

catégories. Notre capacité d'innovation

aidera à la croissance de nos volumes et à

la bonne tenue de nos marges soit avec des

produits qui justifient des prix plus élevés,

soit avec des produits milieu de gamme

mais qui dégageront des marges

importantes grâce à des innovations

technologiques et des manières de produire

plus économiques.


Le positionnement «santé» de vos

produits a longtemps tenu lieu de

stratégie d'entreprise. Vous misiez sur

votre R & D pour faire de la publicité

avec des allégations santé. Votre

stratégie semble évoluer…


Le positionnement de Danone a toujours

été axé sur la santé et le plaisir. C'est la

façon de l'exprimer, l'exécution marketing

qui doit s'adapter à ce contexte. Nous

avons publié nos études cliniques, nos

consommateurs peuvent y avoir accès. De

plus, nous avons aujourd'hui une nouvelle

corde à notre arc avec la marque Nutricia,

acquise en 2007. Si l'un de ses produits,

Fortimel, est aujourd'hui prescrit sur

ordonnance, nous pouvons très bien

imaginer le rendre beaucoup plus

accessible à l'avenir en nous appuyant sur

nos études cliniques. J'ai d'ailleurs coutume

de dire que le métier le plus important de

Danone pour l'avenir, c'est sans doute le

plus petit, la nutrition médicale, qu'il

s'agisse de travailler sur les allergies des

enfants, sur la façon de préserver

l'indépendance des personnes âgées, etc.

Nous nous intéressons à des niches très

précises de la vie quotidienne avec des

produits grand public.


Pourquoi ne pas vous passer

d'allégations sur vos produits, à l'instar

de Nestlé?


C'est l'inverse que nous souhaitons faire!

Lorsque je vois un gamin au Bangladesh

dont les diarrhées à répétition réduisent de

30% l'immunité, j'aimerais lui faire

bénéficier de produits qui améliorent sa

flore intestinale. Nous sommes convaincus

que nos études cliniques participent à la

santé par l'alimentation. Mais

l'alimentation n'est pas un médicament, et

le plaisir fait partie de la santé. Si Activia

est le meilleur yaourt que l'on puisse

trouver, cela n'en fait pas pour autant un

médicament!


Allez-vous réorienter vos efforts de

R&D?


La recherche n'est plus uniquement là pour

inventer des produits aux bénéfices santé

vendus très chers, mais pour donner accès

à nos produits au plus grand nombre. Elle

sert aussi à travailler sur le processus

industriel, la baisse de durée de la

fermentation…


Votre partenariat avec Chiquita vous

permet d'élargir votre portefeuille aux

jus de fruits…


Ce n'est pas un élargissement aux jus, mais

aux fruits, comme nous l'avons fait avec

nos compotes Taillefine. Nous ne

souhaitons pas devenir un concurrent de

Tropicana ! Nous apprenons un nouveau

métier. Chiquita connaît le process, nous

savons valoriser les produits. Ensemble,

nous arriverons avec de nouveaux

packagings, de nouveaux concepts… Nos

produits, qui auront des déclinaisons en

fonction des pays, seront disponibles en

2011 en Europe de l'Ouest.


Pourrait-il y avoir d'autres évolutions

dans le périmètre du groupe?


La réponse est oui! J'ai déjà goûté en

laboratoire de nouveaux produits. Nous

n'excluons pas de décliner Activia dans

d'autres formats que le yaourt. Avec Petit

Gervais, nous testons des yaourts en

poudre auxquels il n'y aurait qu'à ajouter

de l'eau. Inventer de nouveaux produits,

cela veut dire aussi inventer de nouveaux

canaux de distribution. Evian teste ainsi la

livraison à domicile à Paris. Le site

myevian.com, lancé en février, permet de

customiser ses bouteilles d'eau à l'occasion

d'un événement. Cette nouvelle forme de

commercialisation marche très bien et

commencera à représenter en 2011 une

part non négligeable du chiffre d'affaires

de la marque.



WORLD RETAIL SNAPSHOT GLOBAL TRENDS

JULY 2010


WORLD RETAIL SNAPSHOT GLOBAL TRENDS


The retail world’s hottest trends have evolved over the last 18 months, under the influence of a changing context, with the economic crisis still lingering but food sales growing again.

Some of these trends have gained in importance, others have faded. Below is a quick overview:


Small format: stable.

While down in the US with the stalling projects of Tesco (Fresh & Easy) and Walmart (Marketside), the trend towards urban, smaller, more convenient and fresh produce oriented- stores is gaining importance elsewhere (e.g. Carrefour in France).


Hard discount: down.

The huge gains enjoyed by European hard discounters in the early years of the economic slowdown have clearly hit the brakes; but the long term trend remains, not only in Europe but beyond, both in developed (US, Australia) and emerging (Turkey) markets.


Retailer brands: down.

Similarly, the glorious future predicted to retailer brands at the beginning of the crisis has not materialised and seems to have reached a peak, as nationalbrands have found ways to fi ght back and defend their places on store shelves.


Environmental sustainability: up.

As consumer concern on the matter continues to build up,fuelled by heavy media coverage, retailers have not only taken notice of this trend, but seized it fully and proactively,

as shown by Walmart’s ambitious leadership in the field.


CEO turnover: up.

Whether by coincidence or given the new and complex challenges in a global field, some of the world’s largest retailers have changed their heads recently, with the crowningof Mike Duke (Walmart, February 2009), Lars Olofsson(Carrefour, January 2009), and soon Philip Clarke (Tesco,March 2011).


Expansion abroad: up.

As growth has failed to come back as strongly as predicted in developed countries, retailers have continued to rely upon emerging countries in Latin America, Asia and Africa to sustain their growth rates.


BRANDS & RETAILERS COLLABORATE - TESCO/PROCTER GAMBLE

Brands and retailers take a collaborative approach

Marketing Week June 24th 2010

A groundbreaking deal between Tesco and Pringles owner Procter & Gamble reflects the shifting balance between FMCG suppliers and the retail trade that promises to benefit both parties.

Power struggles between retailers and their FMCG suppliers

are well documented but now these relationships are being taken in a new direction, with both sides collaborating. Procter & Gamble has created a "Great British Flavours" line of Pringles exclusively for Tesco, which is thought to be the first time an FMCG brand has created a unique range for the supermarket.

While P&G will not confirm how far this collaboration will extend, it is already in discussions with other retailers about partnerships. Traditional product launches still abound, with

Dunkin Brands recently launching a full range of Baskin Robbins ice cream exclusively in Morrisons stores for six months. And tie-ups are common in the fashion world, where high street retailers H&M, Debenhams and New Look run limited-edition lines from designers Jimmy Choo, Matthew Williamson and Giles Deacon.

But the mixture of P&G and Tesco is unusual in that the brand manufacturer has worked with the retailer to provide an exclusive line. P&G snack sales have suffered recently, with global snack figures down 2% in the three months to the end of April, which may have helped persuade the FMCG giant to work with Tesco.

The partnership ought to be a success because of the strength of both brands, says Mike Ashton, managing director of Ashton Brand Consulting, who started his career at P&G. "Pringles is a very strong brand and P&G is a very smart company." The bold move is not simply a case of surviving, it's creating a much closer relationship, he says. "You would question why it would necessarily want to take a premium end brand that is in no danger of being delisted, and develop it.

"This is a positive-aggressive move, which is the equivalent to 'new and improved'. It's probably a very smart way of setting a precedent on relationship development," he says.

This shows the wider trend in the relationship between retailers and suppliers, he says. Historically brands put marketing spend behind products and supermarkets put them on their shelves, but the rapport between brands and the shops they are sold in is now more complex.

"It reflects the maturity of the relationship and the shifting balance between FMCG suppliers and the retail trade," says Ashton. Suppliers realised some years ago that retailers have a growing sophistication and power and they don't have to take the big brands if they choose not to." New York trends research firm PSFK calls these partnerships "complementary creation", where brands mix together to help the customer

make a choice through association. US fashion retailer J Crew has done this by launching its first standalone men-only outlet in New York, featuring its own brands as well as specially

commissioned pieces from other brands. PSFK consultant Francisco Hui says it is a

formula that works.

Viewpoint on the Pringles and Tesco initiative

essential

Darran Snatchfold, group planning and intelligence director at integrated

Waitrose~ agency Tullo Marshall Warren

original blend

round tea bags

Waitrose: Essential range accounts for 16% of total sales

coming together to create new experiences for people is a win-win situation," he says. But he warns that these collaborations need a great deal of thought in order to benefit both parties.

"The challenge IS to figure how not to cannibalise your own products. You need to consider the untapped niches that no one has catered for," he says. "This may work if the collaborationcan create value beyond price, which is why own-brand goods tend to be chosen."

For Waitrose, this means taking control of a brand itself to mould it in a way to appeal to its own customers. It went into partnership with organic producer Duchy Originals last summer with the retailer manufacturing, selling and distributing Duchy Originals products, which will extend to more than 300 lines by the end of this year.

This follows a more aggressive trend in the supermarket's marketing, which started two years ago when it doubled its advertising spend to £50m and opened a number of overseas stores. Waitrose sales increased 11.7% from January to April this year, compared to the same period in 2009, and earlier this month put marketing director Rupert Thomas on its board.

It has also formed a partnership with Boots that will see Waitrose-branded convenience food being sold in the chemist's outlets, and Boots own-brand cosmetics and toiletries being stocked in some Waitrose outlets.

Dean Brown, head of growth for B2B at Waitrose.

This may be a new departure for Tesco and Pringles alike, but the reasoning behind it will come down to age-old issues for both brands. For Tesco, it will be a straightforward move to add value for its customer base and drive footfall. For Pringles, it's about creating noise and generating preferential store support to get its product in the hands of the consumer. And with the domination of Tesco in the market, that's a lot of hands.

It's unlikely to have an impact on a retailer's own low-cost value ranges, but this adds an extra way for both retailer and brand to compete at the mid-range price point. Presumably, given Tesco's strengths in customer data and accountability, it will have thought through potential cannibalisation and decided that the opportunities were worth the risk.

It's difficult to say whether this will be part of a wider trend for retailer and brand partnerships -although given the increasing domination of the big retailers, brands will always be looking at ways to increase their on-shelf presence and in-store promotion.

What's interesting in this case is that this is the first in a number of exclusive collaborations between Tesco and Procter & Gamble. P&G has to be mindful of how other big retailers will view this new activity. Given the stature and dominance of P&G's brands in the sectors in which it operates, delisting is not an option, but it may well see their competitors' brands given greater in-and out of-store marketing support.

I'm not convinced that Pringles is enough of a hero brand to make this activity worthwhile for Tesco. Are people really going to swap their shopping habits on the back of it? However, if P&G's other brands are likely to create exclusive ranges, this does start to sound like an interesting move to watch.

This is a positive-aggressive move, which is the equivalent to 'new and improved'. It's probably a very smart way of setting a precedent on relationship development

Mike Ashton, Ashton Brand Consulting

Boots help to reach a much wider customer base. "When partnering with brands, we look to work with those that will help us enhance the offer we provide to our customers or make our products more easily accessible.

"This allows us to make our products available to a larger number of customers and make further strides into the convenience retail sector via new formats and channels," he says. These channels include Shell, Boots and Welcome Break, which runs ten franchise Waitrose stores in the UK, with two more to open this summer.

While the supermarket is pushing its own-label as a standalone brand, back in store the retailer's Essential Waitrose range accounts for 16% of total sales and has helped the supermarket's growth, says Brown. "Our own brands are still a hugely important part of our offer and we're finding that more and more people are buying them," he says.

Own-label goods are becoming ever more important for supermarkets. A study by Ipsos in March showed that 80% of global consumers said own-label goods were the same or better than branded goods.

Asda will start revamping its 5,500 own-label products this October. The supermarket's former chief merchandising officer, Darren Blackhurst, says that innovation is key to the success of own-brand products, which account for about

half of overall food sales. "Our goal is to ensure that we offer everything that customers want for their weekly shop -backed

up by a continuous flow of new product innovation

that ensures we stay ahead oftheir needs," he says, thus competing on-shelf with brands that pride themselves on research and development.

For Ashton, the danger for brands is they may be overtaken by own-label products. "The interesting one will be if the day comes when a Tesco Finest brand of shampoo is sitting alongside Pantene, for example, and the customer chooses Finest," he says.

In the US, Wal-Mart's own-brand Equate is the label on a range of health, medical and beauty products, from pregnancy tests to shampoo. Some of its range is on a par with branded goods in terms of price, but many products undercut rival products from brands. For example, Equate anti-wrinkle face and neck cream is priced on Wal-Mart's website at $7.87 (£5.32). Its packaging invites consumers to "compare to L'Oreal Dermo-expertise Advanced Revitalift face and neck day cream anti-wrinkle and firming moisturizer", which costs $13.54 (£9.14).

Perhaps it is competition such as this that is encouraging partnerships between brands and retailers. "The lines between what the retailer does and what the manufacturer does are now blurred," says Ashton. "It's a more creative and commercially expedient approach rather than a traditional buyer-seller relationship. From a business and brand point of view, it is fascirlating how far integration can go commercially."

For the suppliers of branded goods, retail

partnerships appear to be a way to integrate

commercially to benefit both parties.